You run a staffing or recruiting firm in central Ohio. The whole business is getting the right candidate in front of the client before the other firm does — but your recruiters' day leaks into job orders taken by phone-and-retype, screening notes typed twice, interview scheduling tag, and reference chasing. Every one of those hours is speed you're giving away.
The same four places, almost every desk: job orders arriving as phone calls and email threads, then retyped into the ATS; screening calls summarized by hand — or not at all; interview scheduling as a three-way email volley that goes a day per round; and reference and compliance checks chased one voicemail at a time. A five-recruiter shop loses a full desk's worth of hours to this every week.
Resumes and candidate files are personal data, and your clients notice how you handle them. Everything I recommend runs inside your systems and your logins — your ATS, your inbox, your calendar. I configure; I never host, store, or export candidate information, and demos use synthetic data only. No consumer-grade AI tools near candidate data.
Most firms sell a "streamlined process" to clients while running on shared inboxes and retyping. The fix isn't a platform migration — it's wiring what you already pay for so an intake becomes a structured order, a screening call becomes a note automatically, and scheduling happens without the volley. Faster submittals, same tools, no new logins for your clients.
One hour, evenings or weekends. You talk through how an order actually moves — intake to placement. You leave with a one-page plan: the three fixes ranked by payoff, what each saves and costs, one you can do yourself that week for free, and at least one thing I'd tell you to skip. See a sample review →
Ten free review slots this quarter. When they're gone, they're gone.
Claim a free reviewColumbus-based, calls on your schedule. If AI genuinely can't help your firm, the plan says so.